Saturday, April 25, 2020

Book review: "The Flame Trees of Thika" by Elspeth Huxley

My family and I have many fond memories of our 2013 trip to Kenya. The people were friendly, the wild animals amazing, the country full of surprises.

Many of these memories came rushing back to me as I read "The Flame Trees of Thika," Elspeth Huxley's 1957 memoir of her life as a young girl growing up in what was then British East Africa, and is Kenya today.

Huxley's parents brought her from Britain to East Africa in 1913 as they sought, like many young Britons of the time, to seek their fortune farming in "unspoiled" lands. They were told the land was fertile and growing coffee would be easy.

 In fact, no part of the experience was easy -- a fact that helps make "The Flame Trees of Thika" so fascinating.

Much of the book deals with the relations between the white settlers and African tribes people who were often hired as laborers. There are some cringy parts in the way the white adults look down on the Africans. But Huxley isn't here to defend colonialism, just to describe the world as it was to a 6- to 9-year-old discovering life in a harsh land.

There are tales of dangerous leopards, snakes and one notable wounded buffalo. There is a murder investigation. There is the angst of a fellow settler caught in a love triangle. There is a boisterous New Year's Eve party that gets a little out of hand.

In all, it is an affectionate and gentle memoir, and an enjoyable read. Huxley does well drawing out the individual personalities of both black and white characters.

For me, the descriptions of the rolling grasslands, gnarled trees, rutted roads and the diverse wildlife  of Kenya brought back mental images of our 2013 visit. I was surprised how even minor details evoked memories.

For instance, at one point the author mentions how thrilled one of the black laborers was when Huxley's father gave him a watch as a gift. That reminded me -- I had forgotten -- that during our visit two or three Kenyans had separately offered to trade goods for my watch. Later, Huxley mentioned sleeping under a mosquito net, and I was brought back to the two nights in a safari camp we'd spent sleeping under them (and how awkward it was to get in and out to go to the bathroom).

Speaking of mosquitoes, I was taken back to a night in Kenya where a mosquito buzzed in my ear as I tried to sleep after I read this line from Huxley: "No sound concentrates so much spitefulness and malice into a very small volume as the pinging of mosquitoes, as if needles tipped with poison were vibrating in a persistent tattoo."

Note the use of a simile in that line. In "The Flame Trees of Thika," Huxley is the master of all things simile, metaphor and analogy.  Aspiring writers should pay attention.

Here are some that grabbed me:
  • Kupanya emerged from a hut as reluctantly as a very tight cork drawn from the neck of a bottle. 
  • Their voices slid like a stream over smooth rocks, and gurgled into little pools.
  • It was the time of day when heat presses down upon the earth and squeezes out the energy, when men idle in the shade like trout lying nose-to-current on the bed of a stream, when even doves can barely muster the desire to coo.
  • A cold wind shook the trees like a vicious cavalcade of ghostly horsemen riding the air.
  •  When he spoke they greeted him politely but with a wary, almost shifty look, behaving a little like wildebeeste that smell a lion about; they do not panic and gallop off, but tend rather to huddle together, stop grazing and stand ready for action, although uncertain what to do.

  • I picked up the bracelet feeling dazed, as perhaps a beetle feels when, all but scorched against burning lamp-glass, he tumbles out of range and lies there, half stunned to recover. 











mosquito net, , mosquito buzzingN

Friday, January 3, 2020

Can renting a car save you money?

Dedicated readers of this blog will recall that about eight months ago, I calculated the cost-per-mile of driving my car. In the end, I concluded that it cost me 40.2 cents per mile to drive my car at that time (the cost will always vary because of the changing price of gas).

Today I'm wondering if -- given the costs of driving your car -- it can be cheaper to drive a rental car in certain situations.

First, let's break down the cost of driving per mile, as I calculated them: 16 cents for gas, 8.6 for maintenance, 15.6 cents for depreciation. When you rent a car, you still have to pay for gas, but not for maintenance and depreciation. So, with a rental, I'm saving 24.2 cents per mile (8.6 + 15.6) in the latter two categories.

But that doesn't count the cost of the rental itself, and that's a key element in this equation. If I rent a car for one day and drive 100 miles, I've saved $24.20 in maintenance and depreciation costs. But almost all rental cars cost more than $24 for a day, so renting isn't saving you money. 

On the other hand, let's say if I drive 200 miles with a one-day rental that costs a plausible $40. Then I've saved $8.40 ($48.40 - $40) by not driving my own car.

Let's take a "real world" example. Say I want to drive from Long Beach, California, to Santa Cruz, California, spend one day there and then drive back. A total of three days. It's 369 miles each way, according to Google, for a round trip of 738 miles. 

Multiply .242 by 738 finds that I would save $179 in depreciation and maintenance costs for that trip. But how much would a rental car cost?

A little online searching finds a bunch of low-priced rental car offers from sketchy companies I've never heard of. But renting from a reputable outfit like Enterprise for three days would be a total of $125 (and some persistent price hunting might find a lower price).

So yes! You can save money by renting a car. But do your calculations carefully. You're going to save most for a long-distance trip over a short period of time. Be sure the rental car comes with unlimited miles. 

Also, keep in mind the "hassle factor": How will you pick up and drop off the rental car? If it's a long way to get there and back, that's defeating the purpose. Can you park your car at, or near, the rental place? Will you have to pay for the parking? Or maybe you need a ride there and back?  Each situation is different.




One day at the Rose Parade

"It is imperative that you arrive at your parade seat location by 6:30 a.m. on January 1, 2020."

The sentence startled me. A friend had just kindly given my wife and I four bleacher tickets -- each with a face value of $110 -- for the next day's Rose Parade. We were excited by the chance to see the famous parade along with our two kids.

But included with the tickets was a small yellow piece of paper saying it was "imperative" that we be there by 6:30 a.m. Really? Even though the parade didn't start until 8 a.m.?

Getting there by 6:30 would mean we would have to get up no later than 5 a.m. And once we did get there, what would we do? Just sit in our bleacher seats for 90 minutes, on a cold January morning, waiting for the parade to start?

It was enough to make me question whether this was a good idea.

To be clear, you don't have to get tickets to see the Rose Parade. You can watch from the sidewalks for free. But to get a good spot on the curb to sit, someone from your group has to grab some curb space the day before, set out chairs or blankets, and spend the full night there to keep hold of the spot.

If you come in the morning, all the curb space will be gone, and you'll have to jostle with scores of others for some kind of standing space on the sidewalk. I did this once, 35 years ago, but even on my much-younger legs of the time, standing in one spot for three hours was taxing.
A float from the 2020 Rose Parade

Paying for reserved bleacher seats means you'll have a guaranteed spot to sit, and don't have to spend the night sleeping on the sidewalk. But the high price has always deterred me, so when these free tickets fell into our lap, I realized this was a great opportunity. We couldn't pass this up.

The yellow note didn't say what would happen if we didn't get there by 6:30. Would we be denied access? We didn't want to take the chance, so we set our alarms for 5 a.m. New Year's day.

There were other things on the yellow note that drew my attention. "Your seats may be within the boundaries of the Tournament of Roses security zone and you will need to have your tickets to gain access to this area... All patrons are subject to search."

A long list of "prohibited items" included such items as drones, laser pointers, hoverboards, selfie sticks, e-cigarettes, "any kind of noise makers," and "diaper bags unless accompanied by a child. "

Of particular concern to me was that one prohibited item was the strangely phrased "Beverages other than water (all factory sealed)." We were planning to bring water since it appeared we would be there for 4 to 5 hours, but this now seemed to say we could only bring sealed disposable water bottles. Yes, disposable water bottles, the container that has become Public Enemy No. 1 in the fight against plastic waste. Seriously?

It was already late on New Year's Eve at this point; unsure what to do, I slipped two small (non-sealed!) water bottles into my jacket pocket to sneak into bleachers. Would I get away with it? In my mind, I imagined burly security guards frisking parade-goers, eager to snatch away water, hoverboards and diaper bags.

We rose at 5 a.m. and stumbled out of our Long Beach home by 5:30. The freeways were gloriously free of traffic -- a sight so rare in Southern California that it alone nearly made the early start worthwhile.

I'd given quite some thought, the night before, to where we would park. You can attempt to drive into Pasadena and find paid parking, but it's unlikely to be easy or cheap. Hundreds of thousands of people descend on the city for the parade and the Rose Bowl game. So many streets are blocked off, and there are so many people roaming the city, that simply driving anywhere in Pasadena on the morning of the parade can result in extreme aggravation.

We opted, instead, for mass transit. And -- spoiler alert! -- it worked beautifully. We parked at the Monrovia Gold Line station at about 6 a.m. There were a small number of other people arriving around the same time, all clearly headed to the parade. There was plenty of parking.

I was disappointed that we had to pay $3 to park -- I thought the fee might not apply on a holiday -- but I was pleased that there was parking person on hand who gave me the correct information.

We did have to load up Metro Tap Cards with the proper fare, a small chore, but soon after that a train arrived and we were on our way. We exited five stops later at the Memorial Park station in the heart of downtown Pasadena and joined a throng of pedestrians heading to the parade. As we walked, I could see a line of motorists, looking miserable in their idling cars, stuck in the congestion while we strolled casually by.

We hustled as best we could to reach our seats by the supposed 6:30 deadline -- and didn't quite make it.  We got there around 6:40, and found the bleachers 95% empty.  What the?

What's more, there was zero security check and no one ever checked our tickets.

Our seats were not in the bleachers you see in on TV, but about a half-mile down the road, on an overpass overlooking a freeway.

To kill the time, we walked around a bit (the parade route was filled with pedestrians), bought some food and water, and used the porta-potties (hold your nose!).

You know that part about no banning "any kind of noise makers"?  You could buy vuvuzelas -- the plastic horns that can emit a loud annoying buzz -- from a vendor right in front our bleachers. Meanwhile, a set of Bible-thumpers strolled up and down the street before the parade, the "word of God" booming from their speakers. No one did a thing to stop them.

There was never the slightest indication why arriving early was "imperative." You could have walked up and taken your seat without any problem right up until parade time (after the parade started, it would be harder, but not impossible, because you could no longer walk in the street).

Despite the so-called ban on beverages, you could have brought any kind of drink you wanted.

Remember how no one checked our tickets? Once the parade began, there were a smattering of empty seats in the bleachers. It would have been easy for anyone to have come and sit down in the $110 seats. I'm just saying.

And the parade itself? It was great, filled with wonderful floats and exhilarating marching bands. I wouldn't have paid $440 for my family to see it, but it was definitely worth our 5 a.m. wake-up time.

The parade ended at our viewing spot about 10 a.m.  Afterwards, we walked back, amid a large crowd, to the train station. Many people were doing the same, but Metro employees did a good job funneling people into correct lines and keeping everything orderly. We only had to wait about five minutes for a train.

We were back home in Long Beach by 11:25 a.m. A good time to take a nap.








Tuesday, December 17, 2019

Book review: "A Room of One's Own" by Virginia Woolf

Never has such a short book seemed so long. 

My copy of Virginia Woolf's 1929 book "A Room of One's Own" is just 125 pages long, but it took me almost two months to read. Why? Because each chapter was so exhausting that I had to take frequent breaks and get away from the book before I could continue on.

Reading this extended essay is like trying to follow a hyperactive child around the playground: Woolf zigs, she zags, she backtracks, spins around, pauses to rest, then suddenly zooms off in a new direction. 


It's too bad, for Woolf does have something important to say. "A Room of One's Own" is her commentary on the many obstacles that have prevented women over the centuries from succeeding as writers. Her conclusion is that women need a room of their own to write without distraction and plenty of money so they don't have to constantly worry about supporting themselves.

That conclusion is easy to understand, but Woolf's route there is not. There is one sentence in "A Room of One's Own" that is -- I kid you not -- 191 words long.  Deciphering that sentence alone is enough to merit a three-day rest. Despite the weighty matters Woolf wants to discuss, she seems incapable of saying anything in a straightforward manner. 

Take, for instance, this passage:

So long as you write what you wish to write, that is all that matters; and whether it matters for ages or only for hours, nobody can say. But to sacrifice a hair of the head of your vision, a shade of its colour, in deference to some Headmaster with a silver pot in his hand or to some professor with a measuring-rod up his sleeve, is the most abject treachery, and the sacrifice of wealth and chastity which used to be said to be the greatest of human disasters, a mere flea-bite in comparison. 

Translation: Write what you want, and don't listen to what others say.

I know it may sound like I hated the book, but I really didn't. Woolf makes excellent points about how women have been treated unfairly and often denied a chance to succeed as writers.  And, I sometimes actually liked the process of decoding the hidden meanings of her sentences.  But while an occasional cryptic passage could be fun, a book full of them is tiresome.






Friday, November 1, 2019

What Moore League school has the best cross country website?


There are two great cross country websites in the Moore League -- and both belong to the same school. Long Beach Poly's boys and girls teams have separate websites, both stuffed with team updates, race results, historical tidbits and helpful information.

The rest of the league, unfortunately, doesn't come close to matching the quality of Poly's cross country websites. Some of the other schools make little or no effort to produce a site with even basic information.

This is unfortunate, because a team's website is the face it presents to the world. A good site can engage and inspire fans, who may then buy tickets or otherwise financially support the program. It can also win over the parents of students, drawing talented new athletes to your team.

To be clear, a school doesn't have to go to the lengths Poly does to produce a good website. There are only a few things that are essential for a good team site: a current schedule, competition results (or links to pages that have the results), and the names and contact information for the coaches. Other things like a roster, photos and team records are just a bonus. 

Unfortunately, many Moore League schools' site don't even achieve the minimum.

A couple notes: First, this is a review of official team pages, not commercial sites like MaxPreps. Also, websites change, so this review can only capture a "snapshot" at this time. Tomorrow, any one of these websites may be better or worse, or even disappear altogether.
 
Long Beach Poly: A

Both Poly websites, one for boys and one for girls, are excellent. Beyond the essentials, both offer bonus material like training information and race results from past years.

The boys site scores with a clearly stated mission statement, team requirements and team motto. This sort of thing is exactly what parents want to see when they consider whether their child should join a team.

The girls site doesn't have a mission statement, but otherwise it is more complete and better
organized than the the boys site (someone on the boys side needs to clean up the clutter). The girls site even offers driving directions for various venues where the team competes.

While they are not on the Poly school site, they are the official pages for the teams, and people who go first to the school website will find a clear link to them. 

Wilson: B-

Wilson's site has the current schedule, plus the names and contact info for the boys and girls coaches. That's good.

On the negative side, it weirdly has multiple links to results from last season, but none from this year. The main element on the page is outdated information about summer camp.

The Bruins site has some historical listings of past athletes and teams, but it's a motley collection. There is, for instance, pictures of the 2016 varsity teams, but no other years.

Cabrillo: C
  
Cabrillo's cross country site has the current schedule and about a dozen pictures available for download. And that's it. There are no results and no coaches' names or contact information. At least it has the schedule.

Millikan: C-

Millikan's cross country team actually has a halfway decent website, but it's so well-hidden that it's virtually invisible to the public.

A Google search for Millikan cross country will lead to a baffling page on the school's website. The main feature, in the center of the page, is the team's schedule -- from two years ago. On the right is a link the  "Millikan Athletics Website." That leads to a page saying "Error 404: The page you are looking for either doesn't exist or can't be found." 

It would be easy for a user to give up there. But here's the deal: You're in the wrong place.  Remember the first page you went to? If you scroll down -- which few people will do -- you'll see a link to another site, called Running Rams.  This Booster Club-run site is actually the official site for the team, and includes a schedule, some results and a roster. But it has neither the names nor contact info for the coaches (or anyone).

That site is not bad, but who knows it's there?

Jordan: D

The Jordan website promises much but delivers little. The main page features a calendar that would be a great place to put the team's schedule -- but, alas, it's just a blank calendar.

There are five other pages devoted to the history of Jordan's cross country program, three of which have a little bit of history. The 1960s page, for instance, says, "A great decade for the Panther Harriers led by runners like Pat Egan who was Jordans fastest two mile Cross Country runner." 

The textual history is nice, but each page also makes reference to an accompanying collection of pictures ("The slide show below has over 50 pictures," says the "Cross Country in the 1970s" page).  Unfortunately, there are no pictures on any of the pages. 

There is no schedule, no results, no name of coaches or athletes. 

Lakewood: F

Lakewood's has separate pages for boys and girls cross country, but both are equally useless. 

The boys page has nothing but three unlabeled pictures, all of which, bizarrely, are cropped to cut off the heads of Lakewood runners.

The girls page features a four-month-old, now-obsolete announcement about summer training. It has two unlabeled pictures which, thankfully, include the heads of the runners. It also has a three-sentence report on a meet from over two years ago. Has Lakewood had no meets since then?


There is no schedule, no results, no name of coaches or athletes.

Compton: F

Compton has no cross country website, nor even a page. Going by the school website, there is no evidence that Compton even has a cross country team. But it does. Sigh.

Thursday, September 19, 2019

Book review: "The Library Book" by Susan Orlean

The peaceful facade of a library can be deceiving, Susan Orlean shows in "The Library Book." Behind the scenes. a hive of busy workers helps get books to demanding patrons. Reference librarians help kids do homework, settle bar bets for sports fans and answer questions as far-flung as "Which is more evil, grasshoppers or crickets?" (Yes, really.)

Along with such day-to-day functions, administrators continually fret and debate over the role and direction of the modern library. What should a library be doing besides lending books? And in buildings filled with thousands of paper books, there's the constant worry about fire.

The star of the show in Orlean's book is Los Angeles Public Library system. Orleans wraps disparate stories about the history and people of the L.A. system around a central tale following the investigation into the 1984 fire that destroyed 400,000 books a the Central Library.

She recounts the history of the L.A. library from day one, including the story of the head librarian who was fired because she was woman. She joins modern administrators as they discuss how to serve the homeless population that increasingly inhabits the library.

 "Every problem that society has, the library has, too, because the boundary between society and the library is porous; nothing good is kept out of the library, and nothing bad," she writes
 
"The Library Book" starts fast with a description of the stunning 1984 fire. But it soon loses focus as Orlean skitters to and fro on a host of a library-related topics. The arson investigation, while initially interesting, simply runs out of steam as the authorities have few clues to work with and an unconvincing case against a local drifter.

While Orlean is a smooth writer and she finds some interesting tales to tell, the book bounces among so many subjects that it never becomes compelling. I'm almost a perfect audience for "The Library Book" -- I've lived in Los Angeles for over 20 years, I've been in the central L.A. library dozens of times and I'm a librarian -- yet I to nudge myself to keep reading to the end.

If there's a reward in the book, it's Orlean's depiction of the dedication and hard work of librarians and other library workers, many of whom love their jobs. While some have questioned the role of libraries in the Internet age, Orlean ends on a hopeful note.

"Libraries have persisted, and they have grown, and they will certainly endure" 

Monday, August 26, 2019

One night at a Chargers game

The first issue was basic: Where were we going?

As my son and I got ready to attend last Saturday night's Chargers-Seahawks matchup, I found myself stumbling when others asked where the game would be. I could have used the stadium's new proper name but nobody knew what Dignity Health Sports Park was. It was more effective to call it "The stadium formerly known as the StubHub Center and before that the Home Depot Center." It wasn't poetic, but it got the message across.

It had been years -- many years -- since I last attended an NFL game, and I was curious what the experience would be like. Some thoughts:

1. The Chargers Express works really, really well. This free shuttle brings fans to the game by bus from two locations. My son and I arrived at one of those, the Del Amo Metro train station, about 90 minutes before kickoff. There was plenty of parking. We hopped on a waiting bus -- with ample empty seats -- and in a just few minutes we were on our way to the game.

It took about 15 minutes to get to stadium and we were dropped close to the stadium. It was unbelievably smooth (and -- did I mention? -- free!).

After the game, we easily found the shuttle and got on. This time the bus was full and we stood in the aisle along with many others. Still, the bus soon departed and we were quickly back at our car.

To be fair, this was a preseason game with a stadium that was at best three-quarters full. And many people left early, so the crowd at the end of the game was less than it would usually be. During a regular season game, you're more likely to find larger lines to board the bus. Still, the shuttle worked so well for us, I would definitely use it again.

2. Entering the stadium was pretty easy. Yes, we did have to empty our pockets of keys and cellphones to go through a metal detector, but there was no intrusive search of our bag or an insulting pat-down.

3. The atmosphere in the stadium was fun and friendly. There were some light games for fans -- like throwing a football at a spinning target -- just outside the seating areas. There were plenty of places to pay too much for beer and food if you were inclined to do so. During breaks in the game, they had some entertaining games on the big screen, including one comparing pictures of Taylor Swift's ex-boyfriends to those of live shots of "lookalike" fans in the stands.

4. The public address announcer provided little useful information to the fans, and came off instead as petty cheerleader. Sports fans crave information, yet the PA announcer stubbornly refused to name any Seahawk player.

If a Seattle player caught the ball and was tackled by a Los Angeles player -- or visa versa -- the announcer would only name the Charger, never the Seahawk.  (Note that at least half those in attendance were Seahawks fans.)  This small-minded approach was not just tacky, it was frustrating for sports fans on both sides who wanted to know who made a TD run or who threw a great pass.

5. There was too much music. Almost every time there was slightest available moment -- even the normal intervals between plays -- music would blast from the speakers. This was not just annoying for people trying to focus on the game, it also kept us from even hearing the names of Charger players when they were announced (see No. 4)

Have a little faith in the fans, Charger management. We came to watch football. Let us enjoy it.