"How to Disappear" presents an interesting logic problem: If a man claims to be a great liar, do you believe him?
Frank
M. Ahearn's book, subtitled "Erase your digital footprint, leave false
trails and vanish without a trace," is supposedly a guidebook for people
who want to go into hiding. Maybe you're avoiding an abusive spouse,
perhaps organized crime is looking for you, or it could be that you just
feel like abandoning your old life and starting anew – whatever the
case, this book is aimed at you.
I find it hard to believe that
there's enough people in this category to make much of a book market,
but then again, how would you know?
Caller: Hello. We're conducting a survey. Tell me, are you planning to disappear?
<Click>
Given
that this book, as I write this, is sitting at a lofty ranking of No.
7,843 on the Amazon sales list, perhaps there are more people who are
looking to vanish than you would think. Or maybe the book has other
appeals.
What I liked about the book were the anecdotes Ahearn
tells from his days as a "skip tracer." He was paid to track down
people who didn't want to be found, such as
debtors, criminals and paparazzi-avoiding celebrities. To do this, he
often had to "pretext" – that is, lie. He was good at that, Ahearn claims.
"I was the best in the business," he modestly says.
Ahearn says
he could call up any business – a credit card, cable or utility
company, for instance – pretend to be someone else and then talk his way
into getting them to give up an address or phone number or some other
helpful piece of information on the person he was pursuing. Ahearn
claims he's gotten information from New York police and even Scotland
Yard by calling up and pretending to be a cop. In another case, he
called the mother of the person he was tracking, pretended to be a
friend of her adult son and talked her into reciting the man's life
story.
So, yes, Ahearn's pretty sleazy – if you believe he's as big a liar as he says he is.
As
far as disappearing, Ahean has various tips, among them: Always use a
pre-paid credit card and a prepaid phone. Hide assets behind a corporate
name. Apply for an apartment in another city just to leave a false
lead.
I'm not trying to disappear, so Ahearn's tips didn't
interest me that much. And some of his recommendations for websites for
finding information about people (including yourself) are so laughable
you wonder if he's really a professional. He calls Zabasearch "the skip
tracer's Promised Land." Seriously? Zabasearch doesn't even have my
LISTED phone number.
The book can serve as something of a
reminder of how much of your personal information is in others' hands.
As Ahearn ticks through all the steps you need to "disappear," you
realize how entangled we all are in digital recordkeeping. You leave
trails every time you use a credit or debit card, make a phone call, go
to a doctor, join a gym, order a prescription, send an email, surf the
Internet from home, subscribe to a magazine or check out a library book.
---
(Please support this blog by clicking on an ad.)
Monday, April 29, 2013
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Book review: "American Massacre" by Sally Denton
When it was done, all that was left was the screaming and crying of the
children. There were 17 of them left alive, ages nine months to 7 years,
in the isolated Utah valley. Now they were hysterical, having just
witnessed the cold-blooded slaughter of their parents, siblings and
friends. Some 140 bodies lay on the ground around them.
The Mountain Meadows Massacre of 1857 remains one of the greatest atrocities to ever occur on American soil. Yet today it is little remembered outside Utah.
In "American Massacre," author Sally Denton thoroughly outlines this tragedy and the reasons behind it. The killers were Mormons, zealous followers of Brigham Young, who somehow believed they were doing God's work.
The men, women and children who were shot or stabbed to death at Mountain Meadows were part of a wagon train heading from Arkansas on their way to start new lives in California. They were victims of both religious zeal run amok and the worst of bad timing. They entered Utah at a time when tensions were rising between the Church of Latter-Day Saints and the United States government, and Mormon leader Young was exhorting his followers to spill the blood of non-Mormons.
To explain the roots of the massacre, Denton takes us all the way back to the birth of the Church of Latter-Day Saints in 1823, and then traces the history of the Mormon movement up to 1857. At first I thought this seemed excessive, but it soon becomes apparent that it all ties together. Denton shows how the Mormons built up a history over decades of what they saw as persecution. In each place they tried to settle, they were eventually faced conflict and were run out of town.
But, as Denton describes it, the Mormons were hardly blameless. In each place they settled, the Mormons angered the locals with their arrogance, their practice of polygamy and their literal holier-than-thou attitude. They built the biggest temples and shunned those that did not share their practices and "one true God." In short, they were obnoxious.
Eventually, Brigham Young led the Mormons to Utah. A key question that has long dogged the subject of the Mountain Meadows Massacre is whether Young directly ordered the killings. The Mormon church has long denied it and there is no hard evidence proving Young's involvement. Still, given Young's dominant role in Utah at the time, Denton concludes that he must have had a role in the slayings.
"Within the context of the era and the history of Brigham Young's complete authoritarian control over his domain and his followers, it is inconceivable that a crime of this magnitude could have occurred without direct orders from him," Denton writes.
Even without a direct connection between Young and the killings, Denton makes it clear that Young set the stage for the massacre by whipping his followers into a excited frenzy, frightening them with the prospect that enemies from the East would soon be coming to attack them.
Denton has done a good job of assembling the many pieces of this story, though it's unfortunate that she sometimes relies on secondary sources rather than original documentation. Also, in her effort to bolster each key point, she is sometime over-meticulous is citing each piece of evidence. You will find places you'll want to skim ahead.
Today, the Mountain Meadows Massacre is marked only by a modest plaque that draws few visitors. Why has the episode been so forgotten? To gain a foothold in the public mind, history needs a clear and well-understood story. But for 150 years the Mormon church has done its best to stifle an accurate account of what happened at Mountain Meadows.
The church first denied any involvement in the killings, blaming Indians instead. Then the church blamed it on a renegade sub-sect of Mormons acting on its own. Church representatives, Denton says, destroyed documents and lied to handicap investigations. Brigham Young eventually gave up one of his own most ardent followers, John D. Lee, to end any further investigation of the murders. Lee, who was executed in 1877, was the only one ever punished for the massacre.
------
(Please support this blog by clicking on ad.)
The Mountain Meadows Massacre of 1857 remains one of the greatest atrocities to ever occur on American soil. Yet today it is little remembered outside Utah.
In "American Massacre," author Sally Denton thoroughly outlines this tragedy and the reasons behind it. The killers were Mormons, zealous followers of Brigham Young, who somehow believed they were doing God's work.
The men, women and children who were shot or stabbed to death at Mountain Meadows were part of a wagon train heading from Arkansas on their way to start new lives in California. They were victims of both religious zeal run amok and the worst of bad timing. They entered Utah at a time when tensions were rising between the Church of Latter-Day Saints and the United States government, and Mormon leader Young was exhorting his followers to spill the blood of non-Mormons.
To explain the roots of the massacre, Denton takes us all the way back to the birth of the Church of Latter-Day Saints in 1823, and then traces the history of the Mormon movement up to 1857. At first I thought this seemed excessive, but it soon becomes apparent that it all ties together. Denton shows how the Mormons built up a history over decades of what they saw as persecution. In each place they tried to settle, they were eventually faced conflict and were run out of town.
But, as Denton describes it, the Mormons were hardly blameless. In each place they settled, the Mormons angered the locals with their arrogance, their practice of polygamy and their literal holier-than-thou attitude. They built the biggest temples and shunned those that did not share their practices and "one true God." In short, they were obnoxious.
Eventually, Brigham Young led the Mormons to Utah. A key question that has long dogged the subject of the Mountain Meadows Massacre is whether Young directly ordered the killings. The Mormon church has long denied it and there is no hard evidence proving Young's involvement. Still, given Young's dominant role in Utah at the time, Denton concludes that he must have had a role in the slayings.
"Within the context of the era and the history of Brigham Young's complete authoritarian control over his domain and his followers, it is inconceivable that a crime of this magnitude could have occurred without direct orders from him," Denton writes.
Even without a direct connection between Young and the killings, Denton makes it clear that Young set the stage for the massacre by whipping his followers into a excited frenzy, frightening them with the prospect that enemies from the East would soon be coming to attack them.
Denton has done a good job of assembling the many pieces of this story, though it's unfortunate that she sometimes relies on secondary sources rather than original documentation. Also, in her effort to bolster each key point, she is sometime over-meticulous is citing each piece of evidence. You will find places you'll want to skim ahead.
Today, the Mountain Meadows Massacre is marked only by a modest plaque that draws few visitors. Why has the episode been so forgotten? To gain a foothold in the public mind, history needs a clear and well-understood story. But for 150 years the Mormon church has done its best to stifle an accurate account of what happened at Mountain Meadows.
The church first denied any involvement in the killings, blaming Indians instead. Then the church blamed it on a renegade sub-sect of Mormons acting on its own. Church representatives, Denton says, destroyed documents and lied to handicap investigations. Brigham Young eventually gave up one of his own most ardent followers, John D. Lee, to end any further investigation of the murders. Lee, who was executed in 1877, was the only one ever punished for the massacre.
------
(Please support this blog by clicking on ad.)
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
KPMG at a glance
KPMG International
Headquarters: Amsterdam
Business: Auditing, tax and
financial advisory services
Chairman: Michael J. Andrew
Employees: 152,000, including
23,000 in the United States
History: KPMG was formed in
1987 by the merger of Peat Marwick International and Klynveld Main
Goerdeler
2012 Revenue: $23 billion
---
(Please support this blog by clicking on an ad.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)